Three other individuals, including a child, suffered injuries and were transported to the hospital for treatment. Avon and Somerset Police declared a major incident following the explosion.

Authorities evacuated nearby residents to a temporary rest centre at a local Harvester restaurant. A cordon was established around the property as a precautionary measure.

Police have ruled out terrorism as a motive for the explosion. They urged the public to avoid speculation regarding the circumstances surrounding the incident.

Key facts:

• Two adults died due to the explosion.
• Three additional people were injured, including one child.
• The explosion occurred at approximately 6:30 AM on Sunday.
• A major incident was declared by Avon and Somerset Police.
• Residents were evacuated to a Harvester restaurant for safety.

Superintendent Matt Ebbs thanked residents for their cooperation during this challenging situation. The police continue to investigate the circumstances of the explosion while ensuring public safety.

The post Bomb bristol appeared first on News Casino.

What does Paige Thorne’s recent pregnancy announcement mean for her and Drew Wedlake? The couple is expecting their first child, with the baby due in September. This news comes after they began dating towards the end of 2025 and moved in together just three months into their relationship.

Thorne, who rose to fame on Love Island in 2022, shared the news on Instagram, posting a video that showcased her baby bump. In her heartfelt caption, she wrote, “Half of me & half of you. You are already loved infinitely. Baby Wedlake due September.” This announcement has garnered significant attention from fans and followers alike.

In a recent interview, Paige revealed that she had gained weight early in her relationship with Drew, noting a weight gain of approximately 6 pounds (or 4 kilograms). Before the relationship, she weighed around 51 kilograms. At 28 years old, she has expressed the challenges of adjusting to a new living situation and routine, stating, “Basically I moved in with my boyfriend after a very short time of knowing each other aka three months.”

Paige also reflected on the difficulties she faced during this transition, mentioning, “I found that adjustment very difficult so I kept going back to Swansea, never having a routine, never sitting down.” Her candid remarks highlight the personal changes she has experienced since entering this new phase of her life.

As the couple prepares for parenthood, the public is eager to see how their relationship evolves. The announcement has sparked conversations about the pressures and expectations placed on young couples in the public eye, especially those who have gained fame through reality television.

While many fans have expressed their excitement and support for Paige and Drew, details remain unconfirmed regarding their future plans as parents. The couple’s journey into parenthood will undoubtedly be closely followed by their followers and the media.

As they navigate this new chapter, it remains to be seen how Paige will balance her personal life with her public persona. The upcoming months will be pivotal for the couple as they prepare for the arrival of their child and the challenges that come with it.

The post Paige Thorne Announces Pregnancy with Drew Wedlake appeared first on News Casino.

Just Eat has launched a trial using small wheeled robots to deliver food to customers along Bristol’s Gloucester Road. This initiative was anticipated to streamline food delivery services, offering a modern solution to the growing demand for convenience in dining.

However, the situation took a decisive turn when a councillor’s dog was almost run over by one of these delivery robots during the trial. This incident highlighted safety concerns that had not been previously addressed. Moreover, Bristol City Council was not informed about the trial and currently lacks a policy regarding the use of delivery robots, raising questions about regulatory oversight.

The introduction of delivery robots has had immediate effects on local businesses, particularly Kitchen Kings, which reported a significant number of false refund requests made through Just Eat. The owners, Tommie Webb and Will Davies, who opened Kitchen Kings in March 2025, claimed to have refunded over £300 to customers who did receive their food due to these false claims.

Webb expressed frustration, stating, “We are humans, not robots,” emphasizing the challenges faced by businesses in the wake of this technological shift. He further warned that Kitchen Kings may stop delivering completely if the trend of false refund claims continues, stating, “Takeaways can’t survive if people keep scamming free food.”

The impact of these delivery robots extends beyond financial losses. Local businesses are grappling with the implications of technology on their operations and customer interactions. As Webb pointed out, “delivery drivers are just trying to earn a living and shouldn’t be penalised for minor delays,” underscoring the human element often overlooked in discussions about automation.

As the trial progresses, the balance between innovation and safety remains a critical concern for all parties involved. The lack of communication from Just Eat to the Bristol City Council raises further questions about the future of delivery robots in urban settings.

In summary, while Just Eat’s delivery robots aim to enhance convenience in food delivery, the accompanying safety concerns and financial repercussions for local businesses like Kitchen Kings illustrate the complexities of integrating technology into everyday life.

The post Just Eat Delivery Robots Spark Controversy in Bristol appeared first on News Casino.

Who is the artist known as Banksy? While the true identity of this enigmatic figure remains a mystery, it is widely believed that his real name is Robin Gunningham. Born in 1974, Banksy is now approximately 52 years old and has amassed an estimated wealth of $50 million.

Over the years, Banksy has become synonymous with provocative street art, and his works have been sold to numerous celebrities, including Christina Aguilera and Angelina Jolie. In 2022, he made headlines by painting seven murals in Ukraine, showcasing his ability to blend art with social commentary.

Despite various investigations and speculation, including links to Massive Attack’s Robert del Naja and the pseudonym David Jones, Banksy has successfully kept his identity a closely guarded secret for decades. This has only added to the allure and intrigue surrounding his work.

In December 2024, Banksy confirmed authorship of a piece on Instagram, further fueling discussions about his identity. However, the question of who he truly is continues to captivate both fans and critics alike.

Local admirers in Bristol have expressed their admiration for his work, with one stating, “I have been going to the mural for a whole week.” Yet, others have humorously denied any connection to the artist, with one individual saying, “No, I am not Banksy. Unfortunately it ain’t me, I wish it was but I am not that lucky.”

As the debate over Banksy’s identity persists, it is clear that his art resonates deeply with many. The impact of his murals goes beyond mere aesthetics; they often provoke thought and discussion about societal issues.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the true identity of Banksy, but the ongoing fascination with his persona and work ensures that he will remain a significant figure in the art world.

The post Artist Banksy: The Enigmatic Figure Behind the Murals appeared first on News Casino.

Just Eat has initiated a trial using small wheeled robots to deliver food to customers along Gloucester Road in Bristol. This development marks a significant shift in food delivery methods, as the company aims to leverage technology to enhance convenience for consumers. However, the trial has not been without controversy.

Prior to this trial, the expectation was that food delivery would remain a human-centric service, with delivery personnel navigating the streets. The introduction of robots was largely unforeseen and has raised immediate safety concerns among local residents and officials.

One notable incident involved a councillor’s dog narrowly avoiding being hit by one of the delivery robots during the trial. This incident has prompted local officials to voice their concerns about the potential risks associated with the robots operating in pedestrian environments.

As of March 2023, the trial has been running for over a month, yet Bristol City Council was not informed about its commencement. The council does not currently have a policy regarding the use of delivery robots, which raises questions about regulatory oversight.

Just Eat claims that the trial included safety assessments and collaboration with local authorities. The robots are designed to operate at low speeds along pavements and are equipped with cameras to navigate streets safely. Nevertheless, concerns persist, particularly from Councillor Ed Plowden, who has called for stronger national regulations for robot operators concerning licensing and health and safety.

Plowden remarked, “Emma’s dog was nearly run over by one of these a couple of days ago. It’s a very small dog so it may be that the tech bros need to do some more work.” This sentiment reflects a broader unease among residents regarding the safety of these delivery robots.

In response to the trial and its implications, Bristol City Council staff have been tasked with investigating how the trial is being conducted and what permissions were required for its operation. The lack of prior communication from Just Eat has raised further questions about the transparency of such technological implementations.

Just Eat is partnered with Delivers.AI for the robot trial and is also collaborating with the road safety charity Brake to promote safe delivery practices. However, the effectiveness of these measures remains to be seen.

As the trial continues, the outcomes will likely influence future decisions regarding the integration of delivery robots in urban settings. Local officials and residents are keenly observing the developments, hoping for a balance between innovation and safety.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the long-term plans for these robots in Bristol and how the feedback from this trial will shape future regulations.

The post Just Eat Delivery Robots Trial Raises Safety Concerns in Bristol appeared first on News Casino.

The M5 motorway was closed between Junction 18 (Avonmouth) and Junction 19 (Portbury) due to a police-led incident, described as ‘welfare-related.’ This closure has caused significant disruption to traffic across Bristol and surrounding areas.

Traffic management systems reported severe congestion, with vehicles moving at average speeds as low as five mph. Diversion routes were established for both southbound and northbound traffic, with the southbound route known as the Hollow Circle route and the northbound route referred to as the Solid Triangle route.

During the closure, Clean Air Zone fines were suspended to alleviate some of the pressure on drivers. All lanes on the M5 have since reopened, but delays of approximately 30–45 minutes are expected in both directions.

As of now, congestion remains 4 miles northbound and 3 miles southbound, indicating that traffic conditions are still far from normal.

Authorities have advised drivers to allow extra travel time and to check real-time traffic updates before setting out. They also recommend considering alternative routes if possible until traffic conditions improve.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the specifics of the police-led incident, but the impact on local traffic has been substantial.

The post M5 Traffic Incident Causes Major Disruption in Bristol appeared first on News Casino.

According to reports, Gunningham allegedly changed his name to David Jones to evade identification. The investigation cites evidence from a trip he took to Ukraine in 2022 and a handwritten confession linked to an arrest in New York in 2000. During this incident, Gunningham was arrested for defacing a billboard for Marc Jacobs clothing, an act that led to a fine of $310 and five days of community service.

Mark Stephens, Banksy’s lawyer, has publicly disputed these claims, emphasizing the importance of anonymity for artists like Banksy. He stated, “It protects freedom of expression by allowing creators to speak truth to power without fear of retaliation, censorship or persecution.” This perspective highlights the broader implications of Banksy’s anonymity, which has allowed him to produce work that often features satirical and anti-establishment themes.

Despite the controversies surrounding his identity, Banksy’s work continues to resonate with audiences globally. One of his most famous pieces, “Girl With Balloon,” gained notoriety when it was shredded immediately after being sold at auction, further solidifying his status as a provocative and influential figure in contemporary art.

The public’s fascination with Banksy is not merely about uncovering his identity; it reflects a deeper interest in the cultural and political messages embedded in his art. As noted, “The public has a deep interest in understanding the identity and career of a figure with his profound and enduring influence on culture, the art industry and international political discourse.” This underscores the significance of Banksy’s work beyond mere aesthetics.

As the investigation into Gunningham’s identity continues, many have speculated about other potential candidates. Some have even suggested that Banksy could be Robert Del Naja, the founder of the musical group Massive Attack, who is also known for his graffiti art. However, these claims remain unverified.

With the ongoing interest in Banksy’s identity and the implications of his anonymity, the story is far from over. Details remain unconfirmed, and the art world watches closely as new developments unfold. The mystery surrounding Banksy’s identity may be a key part of his allure, but it also raises questions about the nature of art and the artist’s role in society.

The post Artist Banksy: The Mystery of Identity Unraveled appeared first on News Casino.

According to the investigation, Gunningham changed his name to David Jones in 2008, a common name that has helped him maintain his anonymity. This name change, along with his previous identification as Banksy in a 2008 report by the Mail on Sunday, adds layers to the ongoing intrigue surrounding his identity. Gunningham was arrested in New York City in 2000, an event that further complicates the narrative of the man behind the art.

The numbers

Banksy’s works have not only made waves in the streets but also in the auction houses. One of his most famous pieces, “Girl with Balloon,” sold for an astounding $1.4 million in 2018, only to self-destruct moments after the sale. This dramatic event turned the artwork into a symbol of both the ephemeral nature of art and the market’s obsession with it, leading to its subsequent sale for $25.4 million under the new title “Love is in the Bin.”

Despite the identification of Gunningham, Banksy’s lawyer, Mark Stephens, disputes the claims regarding his identity, emphasizing that working anonymously serves vital societal interests. “The public has a deep interest in understanding the identity and career of a figure with his profound and enduring influence on culture,” he stated, reflecting the ongoing fascination with Banksy.

The implications of revealing Banksy’s identity remain uncertain. Observers are left to ponder how this disclosure might affect his safety and artistic expression. The art community has long debated the significance of anonymity in the creative process, and Gunningham’s case is no exception.

As the conversation continues, the art world watches closely. Banksy’s ability to remain a shadowy figure has contributed to his mystique, and the recent revelations may alter the landscape of street art and its reception. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full impact of this identification on both Gunningham and the broader art scene.

The post Street artist Banksy identified as Robin Gunningham appeared first on News Casino.

Nathan Bennett, a former nursery worker, was sentenced to 24 years in prison for sexually abusing five children at the Partou King Street nursery in Bristol. The sentencing took place on March 16, 2026, following a series of harrowing revelations about his actions.

Judge William Hart described Bennett as an ‘evil’ and ‘incorrigible and dangerous paedophile,’ emphasizing the severity of his crimes. The victims, all aged between two and three years old at the time of the abuse, were subjected to horrific acts, including two counts of rape and four counts of sexual assault.

Bennett’s criminal history includes admissions to 13 other sexual offence charges relating to four boys, showcasing a pattern of predatory behavior. His extended determinate sentence totals 30 years, which includes 24 years of custody and an additional six years on extended licence.

Concerns about Bennett’s behavior had been raised by parents in the six months leading up to his arrest. In February 2025, a nursery manager observed him on CCTV engaging in inappropriate conduct with a child, which ultimately led to his apprehension.

The Partou King Street nursery, part of a group founded in the Netherlands, has faced scrutiny regarding its safeguarding measures. An independent review found that the nursery was compliant with national guidance, yet many parents expressed dissatisfaction with the response to their concerns.

One mother of a victim stated, “The guilt and anger has been overwhelming. We sent him to this nursery we thought was a safe place. We hadn’t protected him.” Another parent criticized the nursery’s failure to act, saying, “He was a monster and a predator. He preyed on toddlers, and they didn’t do enough to stop it.”

In light of these events, Partou has committed to enhancing its safeguarding measures, including expanding the use of CCTV across its facilities. This decision aims to prevent similar incidents in the future and restore trust among parents.

The impact of Bennett’s actions has been profound, with twelve families expressing that the sentence does not begin to repair the harm caused to their children. As the community grapples with the fallout, the case raises important questions about child safety and the responsibilities of childcare providers.

As of now, Bennett is serving his sentence, and the nursery is implementing changes to ensure the safety of its young charges. The case serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities faced by children in care and the critical need for vigilance in safeguarding practices.

The post Nathan Bennett Sentenced for Child Abuse in Bristol appeared first on News Casino.

The identity of Banksy, the elusive street artist known for his provocative works, has long been a topic of speculation and intrigue. For years, the public and art enthusiasts alike have debated the true identity of this cultural icon, with various theories suggesting different individuals. The most prominent theory linked Banksy to musician Robert Del Naja, but this has now been disproven.

On March 15, 2026, a decisive moment occurred when a Reuters investigation identified Banksy as Robin Gunningham. This revelation has shifted the landscape of public perception regarding the artist, who has maintained anonymity throughout his career. Gunningham, now 51, changed his name to David Jones in 2008, further complicating the narrative surrounding his identity.

The investigation provided compelling evidence, including a trip to Ukraine where Gunningham was photographed in 2022 and a 2000 NYPD arrest record. These details have added weight to the claims made about his identity, leading to widespread discussion in the art community and beyond.

As a direct effect of this revelation, Banksy’s lawyer, Mark Stephens, has publicly disputed the details of the investigation, stating, “My client does not accept that many of the details contained within your enquiry are correct.” This legal pushback highlights the contentious nature of Banksy’s identity and the implications it has for artistic freedom.

Moreover, the public’s fascination with Banksy’s identity has only intensified. The artist’s works, such as the auction of “Love is in the Bin” which sold for $25.4 million in 2021, underscore the financial stakes involved in his anonymity. The art market’s interest in Banksy reflects a broader cultural obsession with understanding the person behind the art.

Experts argue that Banksy’s anonymity serves vital societal interests, allowing him to address political and social issues without the constraints of personal identity. As Stephens noted, “Working anonymously or under a pseudonym serves vital societal interests.” This perspective raises questions about the role of anonymity in art and its impact on freedom of expression.

The public’s deep interest in Banksy’s identity is not merely about curiosity; it reflects a desire to connect with a figure who has had a profound influence on culture and political discourse. As one observer remarked, “The public has a deep interest in understanding the identity and career of a figure with his profound and enduring influence on culture, the art industry and international political discourse.”

In the wake of this investigation, the art world is left to grapple with the implications of Banksy’s unmasking. The artist’s recent mural outside the High Court in London, created in September 2025, serves as a reminder of his ongoing relevance and the conversations surrounding his work.

As the narrative unfolds, the complexities of Banksy’s identity and the legal challenges that may arise continue to shape the discourse around his art. Details remain unconfirmed, and the future of Banksy’s anonymity remains uncertain.

The post Banksy Unmasked: The Identity of the Artist Revealed appeared first on News Casino.