The Skinny Food Co has launched a High Court claim against B&M, seeking nearly £14 million in damages. This legal action follows claims that Skinny was removed from B&M’s supplier list on two occasions, in 2021 and 2025, with the initial de-listing allegedly occurring after investment negotiations fell through.

Legal proceedings commenced in February, and court filings indicate that Skinny claims total losses from both de-listings amount to at least £16.85 million. In the year ending August 2021, orders from B&M reached £10.7 million, but this figure plummeted to approximately £3.2 million the following year.

Skinny invested over £235,000 in new machinery to meet expected demand from B&M, but the retailer ceased adding new Skinny products to its shelves from 2023. In June 2025, B&M formally notified Skinny of its decision to remove all remaining products by December 2025.

George Spalton KC, representing Skinny, stated that B&M’s decision to de-list Skinny was motivated at least by the breakdown of negotiations between Robin Arora and Skinny regarding a proposed investment by the Arora family. Spalton further alleged that Arora made threatening remarks during these negotiations.

Robin Arora had previously indicated his influence over Skinny’s business, stating he was “the only person that can make or break your business” and that he could “ruin Skinny’s business if he wanted to.” In a direct remark, he told B&M, “You have really f***** yourselves over at B&M.”

B&M has yet to submit its defence in this ongoing legal matter. The commercial relationship between Skinny and B&M began in late 2020, and the current lawsuit marks a significant escalation in their business dispute.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full implications of this lawsuit on both companies and their future dealings.

The post Skinny Food B&M Lawsuit: High Court Claim Seeks £14 Million in Damages appeared first on News Casino.

“Defendant Cosby used his enormous wealth, power, fame, and prestige, giving women like Ms. Motsinger access to a world of celebrities and entertainers,” stated the jury in their verdict. This finding comes after a California jury determined that Bill Cosby was guilty of sexual assault in a civil trial, which concluded on March 23, 2026.

Donna Motsinger, the plaintiff, was awarded $19.25 million in damages. Motsinger alleged that Cosby drugged and raped her in 1972, a claim that has been part of a long history of allegations against the comedian. The jury deliberated for three days before reaching their decision.

During the trial, Cosby did not testify, and he is expected to appeal the verdict. This case marks another chapter in Cosby’s tumultuous legal history, which includes a previous conviction for sexual assault in 2018. He served three years in prison before being released in 2021 when a higher court reversed his conviction.

Motsinger’s case was filed against Cosby in 2023, highlighting the ongoing impact of the allegations that have plagued him for decades. Cosby has faced numerous accusations from over 60 women, which have significantly affected his public image and financial standing.

Cosby’s net worth has reportedly decreased to about $200 million, down from a peak of $300-$400 million, as he continues to face legal challenges and financial repercussions from these allegations. The civil trial’s outcome adds to the scrutiny surrounding his past actions and the legal system’s response to sexual assault cases.

As the legal proceedings continue, Cosby remains a controversial figure, and the implications of this verdict may resonate beyond the courtroom. The case has reignited discussions about accountability for sexual misconduct and the experiences of survivors.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the next steps in the appeal process, but Cosby’s legal team is expected to pursue all available avenues to contest the jury’s decision.

The post Bill Cosby Found Guilty in Civil Trial appeared first on News Casino.

What are the implications of Eni Aluko’s recent victory in her libel case against Joey Barton? The High Court in London ruled in favor of Aluko, ordering Barton to pay £339,000 in damages and legal costs, a significant outcome that highlights the serious nature of online harassment.

Aluko’s legal battle against Barton, which she described as a “two-year marathon,” stemmed from a series of posts made by Barton on his X account. Between January and August 2024, Barton published 48 posts that Aluko claimed amounted to harassment. The court found that these publications were not only damaging but also constituted an attack on multiple aspects of her life and personality.

Following the ruling, Aluko expressed her relief and happiness on social media, stating, “I’m glad it’s the end.” Her legal team, led by Gervase de Wilde, emphasized that Barton has now accepted that his campaign against Aluko was inappropriate. De Wilde remarked, “Mr. Barton has now accepted that his campaign against Ms. Aluko amounted to harassment and that he should not have made the publications.” This acknowledgment marks a significant turning point in the case.

On the day before the court hearing, Barton was arrested for an unrelated incident, which may have influenced the proceedings. He was charged with Section 18 wounding with intent following an alleged assault involving Kevin Lynch, a 51-year-old man. Despite these serious allegations, Barton did not attend the court hearing, raising questions about his commitment to addressing the legal issues at hand.

The High Court case was initially stayed, meaning that proceedings were halted, but the eventual ruling has now set a precedent for future cases involving online harassment and libel. Barton has seven days to request a change to the court order, and the first £100,000 of the payment is due by March 24, 2026.

Aluko’s victory is not just a personal triumph; it also serves as a broader commentary on the responsibilities individuals have when engaging in online discourse. The case underscores the potential consequences of online behavior and the legal ramifications that can arise from it.

As the dust settles on this high-profile case, the legal landscape surrounding online harassment continues to evolve. The outcome of Aluko’s case may influence how similar cases are approached in the future, particularly as social media platforms become increasingly central to public discourse. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any further actions Barton may take in response to the ruling, but the implications of this case will likely resonate within the legal community and beyond.

The post Eni Aluko Wins Libel Case Against Joey Barton appeared first on News Casino.