The Skinny Food Co has launched a High Court claim against B&M, seeking nearly £14 million in damages. This legal action follows claims that Skinny was removed from B&M’s supplier list on two occasions, in 2021 and 2025, with the initial de-listing allegedly occurring after investment negotiations fell through.

Legal proceedings commenced in February, and court filings indicate that Skinny claims total losses from both de-listings amount to at least £16.85 million. In the year ending August 2021, orders from B&M reached £10.7 million, but this figure plummeted to approximately £3.2 million the following year.

Skinny invested over £235,000 in new machinery to meet expected demand from B&M, but the retailer ceased adding new Skinny products to its shelves from 2023. In June 2025, B&M formally notified Skinny of its decision to remove all remaining products by December 2025.

George Spalton KC, representing Skinny, stated that B&M’s decision to de-list Skinny was motivated at least by the breakdown of negotiations between Robin Arora and Skinny regarding a proposed investment by the Arora family. Spalton further alleged that Arora made threatening remarks during these negotiations.

Robin Arora had previously indicated his influence over Skinny’s business, stating he was “the only person that can make or break your business” and that he could “ruin Skinny’s business if he wanted to.” In a direct remark, he told B&M, “You have really f***** yourselves over at B&M.”

B&M has yet to submit its defence in this ongoing legal matter. The commercial relationship between Skinny and B&M began in late 2020, and the current lawsuit marks a significant escalation in their business dispute.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full implications of this lawsuit on both companies and their future dealings.

The post Skinny Food B&M Lawsuit: High Court Claim Seeks £14 Million in Damages appeared first on News Casino.

“I’m here to defend myself and to challenge the allegations being made against me,” stated Gerry Adams as he took the stand in a civil trial at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. The trial, which began earlier this month, has drawn significant attention due to the serious nature of the claims against the former political leader.

Adams is being sued for symbolic damages of £1 each by three men who were injured in IRA bombings, including the notorious 1973 Old Bailey bombing and the 1996 London Docklands and Manchester bombings. The claimants allege that Adams was an instrumental force in the organization of the Provisional IRA, asserting that he bears responsibility for the decisions made to detonate the bombs that caused their injuries.

Anne Studd KC, representing the claimants, emphasized the gravity of the accusations, saying, “Their focus is to shine a light upon the involvement of the defendant in the PIRA in the course of that conflict and to prove on balance of probabilities that he [Adams] was so intrinsically involved in the PIRA organisation that he is as culpable for the assaults giving rise to these claims as the individuals who planted and detonated the bombs.” This statement underscores the claimants’ intent to establish a direct link between Adams and the violent actions of the IRA.

In contrast, Adams has denied being a member of the IRA and has opposed the claims against him. His defense argues that the allegations are based on hearsay and lack substantial evidence. Edward Craven KC, representing Adams, noted, “The defendant’s alleged factual and legal responsibility for the claimants’ injuries is strongly contested, as is the claimants’ ability to bring these claims against the defendant several decades after the expiry of the applicable limitation period.” This highlights the legal complexities surrounding the case.

At 77 years old, Adams has been a significant figure in the Northern Ireland peace process, credited with helping to bring about the Good Friday Agreement in April 1998. His involvement in the peace negotiations has often been juxtaposed with his past associations, raising questions about accountability and the legacy of the conflict.

The claimants’ case relies heavily on evidence from IRA volunteers and intelligence officials, which they believe will demonstrate Adams’ culpability. However, the defense maintains that much of this evidence is anonymous and cannot be substantiated, complicating the claimants’ efforts to prove their case.

The trial is expected to conclude next week, with both sides preparing for a final push to present their arguments. As the proceedings unfold, the implications of this trial extend beyond the courtroom, touching on the broader narrative of Northern Ireland’s turbulent past and the ongoing quest for justice among victims of the conflict.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the potential outcomes of the trial and any subsequent actions that may arise from it. The legal battle not only seeks to address individual grievances but also reflects the enduring impact of the IRA’s actions on the lives of many.

The post Gerry adams faces civil trial over IRA allegations appeared first on News Casino.